Quantcast
Thu Nov 20 2008 10:52 PM
Email:   Password:     |  Register/Subscribe
Search Site:
Advanced
Search
  Archive
Bedford Times-Register
Newspaper Subscriptions
Home | Back

Capital News: More volleys over Project Everest

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us

by Marc Kovac, Capital Bureau chief
A bill allowing college kids to work at the polls on Election Day prompted a pithing match, sans lisp, between a couple of state lawmakers late last month and is further evidence of the continuing rift between the secretary of state and Republicans.

All of which stems from the $2 million Project Everest study released by Jennifer Brunner late last year, pinpointing numerous security flaws in the state's computerized elections systems and outlining a number of recommendations, including centralized vote counting.

Lawmakers have been slow to respond in favorable fashion, however. Republicans have bucked the report's recommendations, stating repeatedly that counties already have invested millions in new voting equipment and that there has been no evidence of widespread tampering and fraud. So, few of the significant recommendations of the report have been implemented, and some counties will continue using touch-screen voting machines in November.

Late last month, on what was supposed to be one of the last days of the session before their summer/campaign recess, lawmakers passed Substitute House Bill 350. In its original form, the legislation aimed to allow two high school seniors, age 17 and older, to work in polling places on election days. Current law allows one such teen to work in precincts.

In its amended form, lawmakers added provisions related to voting machines, the secretary of state's authority to issue directives and absentee ballots.

Senators from both sides of the aisle favored the final version of the bill, passing it unanimously. The rub came when former minority leader, Toledo Democrat Teresa Fedor, attempted a floor amendment allowing the tabulation of optical scan ballots at centralized locations in counties.

The move, in line with the Everest report, was tabled on a party-line vote after an extended floor debate that included a bit of wrangling between Senate President Bill Harris, a Republican from Ashland, and Minority Leader Ray Miller, a Democrat from Columbus.

Sen. John Carey, a Republican from Wellston, quickly responded to subsequent press characterizations of the Everest study as "independent."

"You may remember that I had serious concerns about doing this report when the contract came before the state Controlling Board late last year," he wrote to reporters. "The people hired to do this report share Secretary Brunner's agenda to promote optical scan ballots. Before the Controlling Board's approval, Secretary Brunner assured me, both privately and publicly, that the Everest report would not be used to promote optical scan machines but to make touch screen machines safer.

"The Everest report was disappointing in that it mimicked already published and stated opinions by those with a bias against Ohio's current voting system. In short, the report was a waste of money, and it is only being used as a tool to promote Secretary Brunner's agenda."

That prompted a counter-statement from Fedor praising Brunner and her "nationally renowned" Everest study.

"I believe we must provide every single voter with a free, fair, open and honest voting system," Fedor wrote to reporters, adding later, "We cannot afford such reckless partisan games with Ohio's election system hanging in balance.

"It is my hope that, in this crucial election year, Republicans and Democrats can work constructively with Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner to meet the challenges of administering a topnotch election. It is not too late."

Marc Kovac is the Dix Newspapers Capital Bureau chief. E-mail him at mkovac@dixcom.com.




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Bedfordtimesregister.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 1 Total Comments
1.
    Posted by Victoria June 12, 2008
Senator John Carey is completely twisting the truth when he says "The Everest report was disappointing in that it mimicked already published and stated opinions by those with a bias against Ohio's current voting system." Senator Carey the Everest Report is not "biased opinion" , and neither were the conclusions drawn from similar studies in California and other states. Worth every penny. The Everest study was extensive and exhausting and proved without bias that the machines currently in use are dangerously flawed and easily manipulated by anyone in the position to carry out a partisan agenda. Perhaps your agenda, sir? Elections should have NOTHING to do with political parties. Let me remind you Senator Carey that elections do not belong to political parties, they belong to the people, and they don't belong to YOU. Get it right.

Senator Carey also said "there has been no evidence of widespread tampering and fraud." WRONG again Senator. The way in which this flawed technology COUNTS the vote, there is NO WAY ANYONE can know if the count is accurate because our votes are COUNTED IN SECRET. So Senator Carey's logic is patently misguided. Declarative statements are useless when uttered from a base complete ignorance.

Carey goes on to say "the report was a waste of money." I think not Senator. The Everest study, contrary to what you claim, was extremely useful to citizens because if PROVED what election integrity activists have been warning for years and it vindicated us as being correct in our assessment that these machines are truly dangerous to democracy. Things are not "just fine" in election wonderland, Senator.

There are concerns I have though about centralized tabulation. I and other election integrity activists would like to see our ballots counted in the precinct by those who actually cast the votes before all who wish to observe. Why do we believe that? BECAUSE ELECTIONS ARE NOT ABOUT "JUST TRUST US" anymore!! Get a clue. Eimes have changed whether you like it or not. We citizens have no reason to trust our election officials and WHY SHOULD WE? Why are we always being denied our right to observe the vote count? Hmmm? They are OUR elections. They don't belong to corporations, vendors, lobbyists, political parties or technicians of any description. It is ENCUMBANT ON OUR ELECTIONS OFFICIALS TO PROVE TO US THAT OUR ELECTIONS ARE HONEST"NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. CAPICHE?

My 64 million dollar question to Secretary Brunner is "Why should we be so eager to spend 64 million MORE HAVA dollars on vendors who ripped taxpayers off in the first place? As well, my question to Sen. Bill Harris is "WHY HAVE YOU NEVER RISEN TO DEFEND THE VOTING TAXPAYERS AND MOVED THE LEGISLATURE TO SUE THE VENDORS FOR OUR HAVA MONEY BACK SO WE CAN PAY FOR THE CHANGES THE VOTERS OF OHIO SO DESPERATELY NEED?? WHY? WHY? WHY? DO YOU HAVE THE COURAGE TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION HONESTLY? OR, DO YOU TOO, HAVE A PARTISAN AGENDA? You better come clean with the voters or we will find someone who can"that is of course if we can EVER have an actual honest election in Ohio.


Terms of Service Copyright Record Publishing Co, LLC. 1995-2007. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.
Dix Communications